Last Chance for Sen. Toomey to Vote with Main St. Savers on Retirement Security

We hear from our friends in Washington DC that a U.S. Senate vote on a House Joint Resolution (H.J. Res. 66) that would impede states from improving retirement security for private workers could come today or tomorrow. It won’t come to a vote unless Republican leaders in the Senate think that the resolution will pass – so now is the time for Pennsylvanians to make their voice heard with Sen. Toomey. If he votes against H.J. Res 66 as he should, joining Tennessee Republican Bob Corker, that can send it down.

To refresh your memory, Sen. Toomey should be with us on this issue. A growing number of states have stepped in to help private workers who have no retirement plan at all through their job – more than half of all private workers (about 3 million in Pennsylvania) – set up a savings plan into which they would contribute a small part of their paycheck each pay period. This approach empowers people to save for retirement using their own money, thereby supporting personal responsibility. This approach relieves small businesses of the headaches of researching and setting up a retirement savings plan for their employees. This is why Small Business Majority strongly supports this approach (along with the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce). And it’s another reason why Sen. Toomey, who speaks often of the importance of small business, should support this approach and vote NO on H.J. Res 66.

In an earlier blog, we walked through the details on why Sen. Toomey was wrong to vote with Wall Street and in favor of a companion resolution (H.J. Res. 67) that already impeded big cities from enabling their private workers from saving for retirement. (Here is the Economic Policy Institute’s summary on the same issue.) That earlier blog also explained that there is a bipartisan effort in Pennsylvania to begin studying and then setting up retirement savings options for private workers without them.

What's urgent TODAY is that people need to call Senator Toomey’s offices (here are the phone numbers). Let him know that he should vote with small business, with Main St. Savers, and for personal responsiblity – by rejecting H.J. Res. 66. 

Comments

0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact [email protected]

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture. Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.