The New Version of the GOP Health Care Bill is Even Worse Than The Last One

Posted in:
Having failed to enact a plan that would lead 24 million Americans and 1.1 million in PA to lose health insurance, the House Republicans have returned with a new amendment, proposed by Representative Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), which would lead to larger losses.
Though this new proposal is being touted as a compromise between moderate and far-right Republicans, in reality it is a surrender to the demands of those on the right who have repeatedly rejected the notion that the risks of illness should be shared by all of us, young and old, healthy and sick. The new proposal would place the burden of health care on those who, because of their age or medical condition, find that burden most difficult to bear:
  • It allows states to opt-out of the rule that prohibits insurance companies from charging people with pre-existing medical conditions more.
  • It allows states to opt-out of the rule that limits the costs of insurance premiums for older Americans to five times that of younger Americans. (The ACA sets this ratio as 3 to 1.)
  • It allows states to opt-out of the rule that requires insurance companies to provide essential benefits in all policies, and will make it possible for insurance companies to deny health care for critical medical conditions.
Eliminating these regulations will make insurance unaffordable for millions more in the country as a whole and hundreds of thousands more in Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania, 5.3 million people under the age of 65 — 52% of the non-senior population — have pre-existing conditions. According to a study prepared by the Center for American Progress, a 40 year old who has breast cancer will pay a surcharge of $32,740 a year for health insurance. If he or she suffered from depression, the surcharge would be $9,700 a year, for diabetes $6,390 and for asthma, $4,950. But it would be just as bad for seniors; in addition to being hit with the surcharges for pre-existing conditions, a 60-year old making $22,000 a year would see their net premiums rise by an average of $9,271 under this proposed legislation.
While the MacArthur amendment would require states opting out of these rules to establish high-risk pools for those who could not secure insurance, it does not provide the funding necessary to make them work.
This proposal is not a replacement of the ACA’s guarantee of quality, affordable health care for all. It is a near-complete abandonment of that guarantee.
The Pennsylvania members of the House of Representatives who opposed or said they would have opposed the last Republican plan, and who have repeatedly defended the regulation that would be repealed in this new proposal, have been given no reason to support it now.


0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact [email protected]

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.