Senate Appropriations Committee: Part II of an Education Budget Preview

The Senate Appropriations Committee met on March 30 to discuss the proposed 2015-16 education budget with Acting Education Secretary Pedro Rivera.  Three topics were discussed at the committee hearing that will be key to understanding the upcoming budget process:

Today, we look at the second topic: pensions.

During the hearing, senators kept emphasizing the impact of unfunded pension costs on school districts, with Republican lawmakers making clear that pensions will be their top priority in budget talks.  Three important things to know in the pension debate are:  how we got to this point, why pensions matter, and how to move forward:

  • We’re here because of past state decisions.   Various factors caused the unfunded pension liability, as shown below, but employer funding deferrals remain the largest factor.  The decision to defer payments was ultimately made by legislators.[1]

Source: PSERS analysis

  • Pensions are a critical part of our investment in public education, helping to attract and retain good teachers.  Of all the factors within the control of a school district, teachers are the most influential on student performance by two- or three-fold. Pensions are especially important to improving teacher quality because salaries for teachers are 25% or more below private-sector salaries for the college-educated.



[1] “Partners for Your Future: Pennsylvania Public Schools Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) Budget Report Fiscal Year 2014-2015.”  PSERS, February 7, 2014.  Print.  Page 20.  Accessed April 7, 2015.  http://www.psers.state.pa.us/content/publications/budget/1415budget.pdf

Comments

0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact [email protected]

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.