What You Need to Know About House Budget Plan

Pennsylvania House Republican leaders today introduced a 2013-14 budget that is $100 million less than what Governor Tom Corbett proposed in February. Overall, the $28.3 billion plan cuts $230 million in spending proposed by the Governor, shifting nearly $130 million of the savings to other budget priorities.

A significant piece of the spending reductions come from education—$85 million from reduced state payments for school employees’ Social Security and pension benefits. These savings are the result of deep cuts to education that have reduced the ranks of teachers, reading specialists, counselors and other school staff. The House plan adds $10 million of these savings to the $90 million increase already proposed by the Governor for the K-12 basic education subsidy. Most of the rest of the education savings are redistributed to priorities other than education.

The House plan also reduces the Governor’s proposed spending levels for the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) by $32 million. Child care services for low-income working families are cut by $3 million, while other early learning line items are identical to the Governor’s proposal. County child welfare is cut by $23 million, Medicare prescription drug clawback payments to the federal government by $15 million, services to persons with disabilities by nearly $8 million, attendant care by $2 million, and county assistance offices by $2 million. The plan also adds $20 million to Medical Assistance – Capitation payments, nearly $8 million to long-term care, and nearly $4 million for critical care hospitals. Mental health services also got a slight increase.

The House plan reduces the Governor’s proposed spending levels for the Department of Community and Economic Development by $22 million, the Governor’s Executive Offices (for technology upgrades) by $19 million, and the Department of Corrections by $10 million. Also cut by $1 million or more are the Treasury Department, the Department of General Services, and the Board of Probation and Parole.

The House plan takes the savings from these cuts and uses them to increase appropriations in a number of areas. The House rejected the Governor’s proposal to shift some administrative costs for the Insurance Department and Department of Transportation out of the General Fund, thereby increasing their budgets by $14 million and $10 million, respectively. The plan also restored funding for biotech research, diabetes and epilepsy support programs, county conservation districts, a number of agricultural programs, crime labs and State Police, and the state’s open records office. Appropriations for the Legislature would rise by $4 million, and for the Judiciary by nearly $5 million. Also in line for slight increases are the offices of the Attorney General and Auditor General. 

The budget includes neither savings from pension changes proposed by the Governor in February nor savings that would come with an expansion of the Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act. Representative Bill Adolph, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, was careful when he discussed the Medicaid expansion during today's press conference, noting that the House was awaiting the Governor's decision and that the budget may have to be adjusted if the state opts to expand Medicaid in 2014.

House leadership said that based on May collections they have seen so far, the state will have a smaller revenue shortfall than the Independent Fiscal Office (IFO) projected earlier this month. Even so, it is unclear how the budget can be balanced without making deeper cuts or raising additional revenue.

That is why some lawmakers—and even the Corbett administration—are considering a delay in the phaseout of the capital stock and franchise tax. This corporate tax has already been cut by 85% and is scheduled to be completely eliminated in 2014. Lawmakers could freeze the tax rate at 2012 levels, raising an estimated $360 million more to help prevent a new round of cuts and preserve the modest spending increases proposed by the Governor and the House leaders.

The House plan does not address the capital stock and franchise tax phaseout, but as House leaders said Wednesday, their plan is a starting point. The bottom line for lawmakers as they negotiate a final budget should be how to preserve investments in schools, health care, mental health services, childcare and other services. Pennsylvania cannot afford more funding cuts to these critical investments in our future.  


0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact [email protected]

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.