Are Economic Elites Awaking to the Need to Do Something About Inequality?

The first in an occasional series on reducing inequality

Are American opinion leaders and policymakers finally ready for a serious effort to reduce economic inequality and rebuild opportunity in America?

In a series of blog posts, we will point to growing evidence that they might be, thanks to a powerful mix of unrelenting data on economic polarizations and worker campaigns demanding a change. Better late than never.

In this first entry, I want to set up the series with some context.

To working families and a small community of data-driven labor economists, it has been obvious since the 1980s that economic inequality has been growing in the United States. (The Economic Policy Institute's first The State of Working America came out in 1988.)

Since the 1990s, a central cause of this inequality has been the low wages and benefits provided to workers in service-sector jobs that cannot relocate because they have to be near their customers. We are talking about jobs in fast food and other restaurants, janitorial services, health care, early childhood and higher education, child care, long-term care, and retail — the growth of internet shopping notwithstanding. These sectors account for the vast majority of the lowest-paid third of wages.

The obvious, and simplest, way to reduce inequality — rebuilding the middle class — would be to pay lower-wage workers in non-mobile services more money. After all, the employer can't relocate.

There are two basic ways to lift wages a lot in low-wage service jobs that can't relocate. You can raise wages directly through public policy (e.g., minimum and living wage laws, and occupational or industry wage standards such as prevailing wage laws in construction). Or you can provide workers a real right to form labor organizations that include all the workers within a geographical area that are employed within each industry. These unions would bargain regionally, similar to building trades unions, and lift wages and benefits to levels that can support a family — $15 per hour in fast food, for example. (For more on these types of unions, click here or here.)

You with me so far? This really isn't rocket science.

In fact, a study undertaken at a little-known Congressional research agency called the Office of Technology Assessment in late 1993 was aimed at explaining all this. The study also aimed to explain (perhaps too academically or technocratically) that smart policies could fix inequality AND make the economy MORE productive. Unfortunately, the Gingrich Congress closed OTA (as we wrote about here).

The study focused on non-mobile industries — in other words, most of the economy — was reworked for publication outside OTA and received little attention. Even if OTA hadn't closed, the economy probably needed to become further polarized, and workers readier to challenge their lot, before opinion leaders and policy makers would actually consider real fixes.

Do we have a level of inequality and worker discontent adequate now to wake opinion leaders and policymakers into a (deep baritone now) "serious discussion" and, heaven's to Betsy, action in some place? In future blog posts over the next year, we'll point to some hopeful signs and make suggestions on how to build on those, including at the state and local level in Pennsylvania.


0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact [email protected]

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture. Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.